Research on the Mechanism of Involution from the Perspective of Supermodular Games

Main Article Content

Zhang Xiaofeng

Abstract

By constructing two-player and multi-player game models and incorporating strategic complementarity analysis from supermodular games, this paper reveals how individuals increase their effort levels to cope with competition, leading to overall system resource waste. On this basis, the paper further analyzes how different game parameters affect equilibrium stability, showing how involution gradually forms through dynamic game evolution, and validates the model through simulation experiments. The novelty of this paper lies in the first-time application of supermodular games to the study of involution, providing a new theoretical perspective and a detailed exploration of the formation mechanism of involution through multi-level game models and simulation experiments. Furthermore, this paper proposes policy recommendations to address involution, emphasizing the optimization of institutional design and adjustments to incentive mechanisms to break the involution trap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Xiaofeng, Z. (2025). Research on the Mechanism of Involution from the Perspective of Supermodular Games. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 16(3), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.61841/turcomat.v16i3.15463
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Akerlof, G., Kranton, R. Economics and Identity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115(3): 703-743.

2. Bergemann, D., Morris, S. Risk-Sensitive Preferences and Supermodular Games, Journal of Economic Theory, 2005, 125(1): 39-65.

3. Cai, X., Liu, M., Xu, Y. (2023). The Impact of Public Examination Involution in Post-Pandemic China: Evidence from College Entrance Examinations. Social Science Journal.

4. Chakraborty, S., Vohra, R. Designing Mechanisms with Supermodular Preferences, Econometrica, 2018, 86(3), 1023-1048.

5. Chen, Y. (2023). Analysis of Educational Anxiety under the Double Reduction Policy in the Context of Involution. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 2023.

6. Choi, S. Supermodularity and Market Structure, Theoretical Economics, 2012, 7(3), 639-661.

7. Clark, D., Gertler, P. Supermodularity in Competitive Markets: An Industrial Organization Perspective, Review of Economic Studies, 2010, 77(2): 455-479.

8. Duara, P. (1988). Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900–1942. Stanford University Press.

9. Fei, X. (2002). The Sociology of Chinese Rural Society: The Complexity of China’s Social Structure. Beijing: Social Sciences Academy Press.

10. Fudenberg, D., Maskin, E. The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information, Econometrica, 1986, 54(3): 533-546.

11. Gan, N. (2023). The Effect of Cultural Capital on Students’ Academic Motivation in the Context of Involution: Ecological Perspective. SHS Web of Conferences, 2023.

12. Geertz, C. Agricultural Involution, University of California Press, 1963.

13. Goldenweiser, A. (1936). Loose Ends of a Theory on the Individual Pattern and Involution in Primitive Society. American Anthropologist, 38(2), 183–192.

14. Guth, W., Klose, A. Evolutionary Supermodular Games and Cooperation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2013, 23(4), 737-762.

15. Huang, P. C. C. (1990). The Peasant Family and Rural Development in the Yangzi Delta, 1350–1988. Stanford University Press.

16. Kreps, D. Game Theory and Economic Modelling, Oxford University Press, 2015.

17. Lazear, E. American Economic Review, 1981, 71(3): 408-421.

18. Li, M., Wu, Y., Zhang, S. Dynamic Supermodular Games with Policy Interventions, International Journal of Game Theory, 2025, 53(2), 221243.

19. Maskin, E., Sjoöström, T. Handbook of Social Choice, Elsevier, 2002.

20. Milgrom, P., Roberts, J. Econometrica, 1990, 58(6): 1253-1270.

21. Pereira, F., Sandholm, T. Supermodular Games and Strategic Behavior in Artificial Intelligence, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2017, 58, 123-145.

22. Shapley, L., Whinston, D. Cooperative Supermodular Games in Networked Systems, Operations Research, 2019, 67(4), 1022-1043.

23. Sobel, J. Supermodular Games in Market Design: An Overview, Journal of Market Design, 2020, 10(1), 15-34.

24. Tirole, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press, 1988.

25. Topkis, D. Supermodularity and Complementarity, Princeton University Press, 1998.

26. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039-1061.

27. Wang, L., Zhu, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, L. (2025). Involution and Governance Reform in Professional Football Club–School Integration: A Case Study of S City’s Youth Training Base. Frontiers in Physiology, 16.

28. Wang, Y. (2024). A Brief Analysis of Students’ Chinese-style Competitive Behavior. Modern Economics & Management Forum, 2024.

29. Xia, Y. (2023). Research on the Involution Phenomenon of Finance College Students. Journal of Economic Theory.

30. Xu, Z. Supermodular Games with Asymmetric Information, Journal of Economic Theory, 2023, 175, 112-135.

31. Xu, Z. The Construction of Theory and the Reconsideration of Methodology–to Mention from the ”Involution” Theory, Journal of Hubei University of Economics, 2008.

32. Zhang, Y., Wang, X. Supermodular Games and Social Networks: A Network Perspective, Journal of Network Economics, 2024, 15(4), 45-67.

Similar Articles

<< < 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.