The Geometric Origin of G–c Unification: The Decisive Role of the Space–Mass Coupling Constant μg

Main Article Content

Xiangqian Zhang
Yuchuan Xu

Abstract

This study reveals the unified geometric origin of the gravitational constant G and the speed of light c. By introducing the rotational scaling length , defining the helical divergence strength  and the space–mass coupling relation , we establish a one-to-one correspondence between mass and geometric scale. Under the unique bridging law , we rigorously derive the invariant


This result demonstrates that G and c are not independent constants but are jointly fixed by the space–mass coupling constant and geometric structure. Using observational data from solar redshift, light deflection, planetary perihelion precession, and both Jupiter’s satellites and the white dwarf Sirius B, we verify the universality and cross-modal consistency of this relation. Geometric scaling not only explains the origin of G but also establishes a unified theoretical framework for future high-precision astronomical observations and constant metrology. This offers a more geometric expression than general relativity and proposes testable metrological predictions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zhang, X., & Xu, Y. (2025). The Geometric Origin of G–c Unification: The Decisive Role of the Space–Mass Coupling Constant μg. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 16(3). https://doi.org/10.61841/turcomat.v16i3.15455
Section
Thesis

References

1. Zhang, X., Xu, Y. (2025). Gravitational field and object motion induced by electromagnetic variation. Xinjiang Iron & Steel Journal, Issue 1.

2. Zhang, X., Xu, Y. (2024). Experiment on positive and negative gravitational fields generated by accelerated positive charges. China Pictorial Journal, Issue 16.

3. Zhang, X. (2025). Unified Field Theory (Academic Edition). Hope Grace Publishing.

4. IAU Resolution B3 (2015). Adoption of nominal solar and planetary values. In Proceedings of the IAU General Assembly, Honolulu.

5. NASA JPL. Solar System Dynamics: Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides (DE series). Provides constants GM and orbital elements.

6. Kopeikin, S.M., G., Gwinn, C.R., Eubanks, T.M. (1999). Astrometric and timing effects of gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D, 59, 084023.

7. Shapiro, I.I. (1964). Fourth Test of General Relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 13, 789.

8. Bertotti, B., Iess, L., Tortora, P. (2003). A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft. Nature, 425, 374–376.

9. Will, C.M. (2014). The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 4.

10. Lindegren, L., Dravins, D. (2003). Astrometric radial velocities II: Solar gravitational redshift. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 401, 1185–1201.

11. Caccin, B., Cavallini, F., Ceppatelli, G., Righini, A. (1985). Solar gravitational redshift from high-resolution observations. A&A, 149, 357–362.

12. J., et al. (2020). Measurement of the solar gravitational redshift using a laser frequency comb. A&A, 641, A87.

13. Holberg, J.B., Barstow, M.A., Hubeny, I. (1998). Sirius B: A white dwarf benchmark. Astrophysical Journal, 497, 935–942.

14. Bond, H.E., et al. (2017). Hubble Space Telescope Astrometry of Sirius B: A Dynamical Mass of 1.018 0.011 ApJ, 840, 70.

15. Joyce, S.R.G., et al. (2018). The gravitational redshift of Sirius B measured with HST/STIS. MNRAS, 481, 2361–2370.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.